From: Gaetano Borriello [gaetano@cs.washington.edu]
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2000 10:58 PM
To: lazowska@cs.washington.edu
Subject: Revised faculty annual review procedures

Here is a rough cut of what the Faculty R&R had in mind.  Besides the very last
point - taking notes during annual meeting on goals for coming year - it should
basically be what we do now.  The message to faculty is that their reflective
statements are VERY important and they should take them seriously.  Hitting
the goals they personally have for the coming year and longer-term.

Let me know if you need further elaboration.

Gaetano

-----

Yearly for ALL faculty:

        student evaluation of each regular course taught
        self-evaluation statement for each course
        peer evaluation of teaching
        activity report by faculty member
        comprehensive CV
        reflective statement

Process:
        two appointed faculty do peer review of teaching of each faculty member
        two appointed faculty do annual review of each assistant professor/lecturer
        executive committee does annual review of associate/full professors
        chair does annual review of executive committee members
        chair generates a letter to each faculty member based on reviews
        chair meets with each faculty member
                discuss activity report
                discuss reflective statement
                discuss letter and any questions/inconsistencies
                discuss goals for coming year if not in reflective statement
                discuss long-term goals (where do you want to be in 5 years,
                        what do you want your legacy to be)
        chair and faculty member leave meeting with list of goals for coming
                year based on notes taken during meeting