I'd better explain this:  I named incoming reports like this:

	99.jo.smith.tex

which means a report on paper 99, refereed by smith.  jo indicates
the responsible PC member (Jones).
     I used two scripts, one to generate full referee reports,
including confidential remarks (for the chair), and one to generate
`public' reports for authors.  Here are the two scripts:

--------------------------------------------------------------------
#
# Produce full PEPM 94 referee reports in dvi format.
# 
# Usage: fullref file(s)
#
# Examples: 
#   fullref *        Select all reports and include confidential part
#   fullref 21*      Select full reports for paper 21
#   fullref ???jo*   Select full reports from PC member whose code is `jo'
# 
# In each case, output is in file full.dvi.
#

cat $home/pepm/.prologue $* $home/pepm/.epilogue > full.tex
latex full
--------------------------------------------------------------------
#
# Produce non-confidential PEPM 94 referee reports in dvi format.
# 
# Usage: publref file(s)
#
# Examples: 
#   publref *        Select all reports but leave out confidential part
#   publref 21*      Select reports for paper 21, drop confidential part
#   publref ???jo*   Select reports from PC member whose code is `jo',
#                    leaving confidential parts out
# 
# In each case, output is in file publ.dvi.
#

cat $home/pepm/.prologue $* $home/pepm/.epilogue | awk -f $home/pepm/dropconfide
ntial > publ.tex
latex publ
--------------------------------------------------------------------
In ~home/pepm I had three files.  Two of these, .prologue and .epilogue
I'll send with the referee form, separately.  The third is an awk program,
dropconfidential, which removes the confidential parts:

$1 ~ /^\\ConfidentialPart/ { conf = 1
                            }
conf == 0
$1 ~ /^\\end\{RefReport\}/ { print $0
                             conf = 0
                            }
--------------------------------------------------------------------